Firm Index · Practice ranking
Top Healthcare & Life Sciences firms
The firms with the deepest healthcare & life sciences footprint, ranked 0–100 by the Sartori Firm Index.
Leading Healthcare & Life Sciences firms by Index
These are the law firms with the strongest public Healthcare & Life Sciences footprint, ranked by the Sartori Firm Index — a 0–100 measure of scale, reach and hiring built entirely from public data. The ranking reflects how large and active each firm's presence is, not the quality or prestige of its healthcare & life sciences practice. Depth labels (“major”, “strong”, “present”) show how central healthcare & life sciences is to each firm relative to its size. Headcount is the attorney footprint we map from public sources, shown as ranges. Explore the Healthcare & Life Sciences talent market →
| # | Firm | Index | Depth | Tier | Attorneys mapped | Top markets |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Clyde & Co | 68.4 | present | Global | 1,500–2,500 | London, Manchester, New York… |
| 2 | Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani | 68.2 | strong | National | 1,500–2,500 | San Francisco, Los Angeles, New York… |
| 3 | Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith | 65 | strong | National | 1,500–2,500 | Los Angeles, New York, San Francisco… |
| 4 | Covington & Burling | 61.6 | present | Global | 1,500–2,500 | Washington, New York, San Francisco… |
| 5 | Wilson Elser | 61.4 | present | National | 1,000–1,500 | New York, Los Angeles, San Francisco… |
| 6 | DAC Beachcroft | 60.1 | strong | Global | 500–1,000 | London, Bristol, Leeds… |
| 7 | Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath | 60.1 | present | International | 1,000–1,500 | Minneapolis, Indianapolis, Chicago… |
| 8 | Littler Mendelson | 59.9 | present | Global | 1,500–2,500 | San Francisco, Los Angeles, Bogotá… |
| 9 | Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough | 59.6 | present | National | 1,000–1,500 | Atlanta, Columbia, Miami… |
| 10 | Baker & Hostetler | 58.5 | present | National | 1,000–1,500 | New York, Cleveland, Washington… |
| 11 | Holland & Knight | 57 | strong | Global | 1,500–2,500 | Washington, Miami, New York… |
| 12 | Sidley Austin | 57 | present | Global | 1,500–2,500 | New York, Chicago, Washington… |
| 13 | Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz | 56.2 | strong | National | 500–1,000 | Nashville, Baltimore, Memphis… |
| 14 | Husch Blackwell | 54.8 | strong | National | 1,000–1,500 | St. Louis, Kansas City, Milwaukee… |
| 15 | Bradley Arant | 54.2 | strong | National | 500–1,000 | Birmingham, Nashville, Atlanta… |
| 16 | Marshall Dennehey | 53.2 | strong | National | 500–1,000 | Philadelphia, New York, Pittsburgh… |
| 17 | Fisher & Phillips | 53 | present | International | 500–1,000 | Los Angeles, Atlanta, San Diego… |
| 18 | Quintairos Prieto Wood & Boyer | 52.6 | strong | National | 500–1,000 | Miami, Orlando, Chicago… |
| 19 | Ropes & Gray | 52.5 | major | Global | 1,500–2,500 | Boston, New York, London… |
| 20 | Hinshaw & Culbertson | 52.2 | present | National | 500–1,000 | Chicago, Miami, New York… |
| 21 | Barnes & Thornburg | 52 | present | National | 1,000–1,500 | Indianapolis, Chicago, Los Angeles… |
| 22 | King & Spalding | 51.8 | strong | Global | 1,000–1,500 | Atlanta, Washington, New York… |
| 23 | Taylor Wessing | 51.5 | major | Global | 1,000–1,500 | London, Hamburg, Düsseldorf… |
| 24 | Foley & Lardner | 50.9 | present | International | 1,000–1,500 | Milwaukee, Chicago, Washington… |
| 25 | McGuireWoods | 50.5 | strong | International | 1,000–1,500 | Richmond, Charlotte, Washington… |
| 26 | Mintz Levin | 50.4 | strong | International | 500–1,000 | Boston, New York, Washington… |
| 27 | Sheppard Mullin | 50.2 | major | Global | 1,000–1,500 | Los Angeles, New York, San Diego… |
| 28 | Quarles & Brady | 50 | strong | National | 500–1,000 | Milwaukee, Chicago, Phoenix… |
| 29 | Phelps Dunbar | 49.5 | present | International | 250–500 | New Orleans, Baton Rouge, Tampa… |
| 30 | Manatt | 49.5 | strong | National | 500–1,000 | Los Angeles, New York, Washington… |
| 31 | Irwin Mitchell | 48.8 | strong | National | 500–1,000 | London, Birmingham, Sheffield… |
| 32 | Polsinelli | 48.3 | strong | National | 1,000–1,500 | Kansas City, Chicago, St. Louis… |
| 33 | Benesch | 48.2 | strong | National | 500–1,000 | Cleveland, Chicago, New York… |
| 34 | Alston & Bird | 47.6 | present | International | 1,000–1,500 | Atlanta, New York, Washington… |
| 35 | Freeman Mathis Gary | 47.6 | present | National | 500–1,000 | Atlanta, Los Angeles, Philadelphia… |
| 36 | Wood Smith Henning & Berman | 47.5 | present | National | 500–1,000 | Los Angeles, New York, Orlando… |
| 37 | Weightmans | 47 | strong | National | 500–1,000 | Liverpool, London, Manchester… |
| 38 | Robinson & Cole | 47 | strong | National | 250–500 | Hartford, New York, Boston… |
| 39 | Arnold & Porter | 46.4 | strong | Global | 1,000–1,500 | Washington, New York, San Francisco… |
| 40 | Bass Berry & Sims | 46.4 | major | National | 250–500 | Nashville, Memphis, Washington… |
| 41 | Nixon Peabody | 46.2 | present | International | 500–1,000 | Boston, New York, Washington… |
| 42 | Carlton Fields | 46 | present | National | 250–500 | Tampa, Miami, New York… |
| 43 | Hall Booth Smith | 45.5 | major | National | 250–500 | Atlanta, New York, Columbus… |
| 44 | Crowell & Moring | 45.1 | strong | Global | 500–1,000 | Washington, New York, Los Angeles… |
| 45 | JMW Solicitors | 45.1 | present | National | 250–500 | Manchester, London, Liverpool |
| 46 | Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein | 45.1 | strong | National | 250–500 | Charlotte, Raleigh, Atlanta… |
| 47 | Wyatt Tarrant & Combs | 45.1 | strong | National | 250–500 | Columbus, Cincinnati, Louisville… |
| 48 | Harris Beach Murtha | 44 | strong | National | 250–500 | New York, Rochester, Albany… |
| 49 | Gleiss Lutz | 44 | present | International | 250–500 | Stuttgart, Frankfurt, Berlin… |
| 50 | Greensfelder, Hemker & Gale | 43.9 | strong | National | 250–500 | St. Louis, Cleveland, Cincinnati… |
Index measures public footprint and momentum, not quality or prestige. Methodology. Spot an error? Tell us.
Related views
Healthcare & Life Sciences talent market
Every firm and credible mover in this practice, mapped and qualified.
Explore the marketWho's hiring in Healthcare & Life Sciences
Firms advertising live roles in this practice on their own careers sites.
See hiring nowThe full Sartori Firm Index
All firms ranked by footprint and momentum.
View the indexHealthcare & Life Sciences firm rankings — common questions
How are the top Healthcare & Life Sciences firms ranked?
Firms are ordered by the Sartori Firm Index — a 0–100 score built from public signals (scale, geographic and practice reach, live hiring). This page lists firms for whom healthcare & life sciences is a leading practice. The Index measures public footprint and momentum, not the quality of any firm's healthcare & life sciences work.
What does the depth label mean?
“Major”, “strong” and “present” describe how large a share of the firm's mapped attorneys work in healthcare & life sciences, relative to the firm's overall size — a footprint signal, not a quality judgement.
Hiring in Healthcare & Life Sciences?
Turn the ranking into a shortlist.
Whether you are building a team or weighing a move, we listen first. No obligation.